Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post Reply

Does PP deserve a ban for 'dumbfuckery'?

-1- Yes, that post is full of dumbfuckery to the max
3
27%
-2- No, 'dumbfuckery' is an invalid bourgeois concept
3
27%
-3- Spike's pony is a dumb fucker. Fuck Spike's pony.
5
45%
 
Total votes: 11

User avatar
jeanV
Posts: 3790
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:25 pm
Karma: 2502

Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by jeanV » Mon Jul 02, 2018 2:08 am

Image

I hope you plebes will have noted the fact and been thankful for it:

I have been the ultimate laissez-faire mod.

I freed all those banned by previous mods and never banned anybody*.
* matoub's short ban doesn't count for two reasons: 1/he's a nobody 2/the time-out can only have helped to lessen his sick obsession with me.

I received a call to ban someone & leave the decision to you, my TTH friends.

• The post in question is pictured above, here's the link:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5673&p=40704#p40704

• 'Anonymous' says it's worth a ban because: "Reported for dumbfuckery"


Ban or not ban, decide and comment.

Vote wisely.

:geek:
Benedict Arnold Trump is a conceited idiot: Lock him up!!

User avatar
PistolPierre
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:05 pm
Karma: 147

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by PistolPierre » Mon Jul 02, 2018 2:44 am

A ban from this site might be useful in the future, but I don't understand the reason, someone doesn't like guffman?

User avatar
jeanV
Posts: 3790
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:25 pm
Karma: 2502

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by jeanV » Mon Jul 02, 2018 3:19 am

PistolPierre wrote:
Mon Jul 02, 2018 2:44 am
A ban from this site might be useful in the future, but I don't understand the reason, someone doesn't like guffman?
I have had a complete disclosure policy.

'Anonymous' reported your post for 'dumbfuckery'. Not more, no less.

I do not think it's possible to conclude if the reporter doesn't like Mr. Guffman per se.

:?:
Benedict Arnold Trump is a conceited idiot: Lock him up!!

User avatar
Richard
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:36 pm
Karma: 776

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by Richard » Mon Jul 02, 2018 5:24 pm

Should Roger be bant for wanton faggotry?

User avatar
Slappy
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 5:36 pm
Karma: 2116
Location: Lymes backyard shed

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by Slappy » Mon Jul 02, 2018 5:27 pm

I didn't hit the mod button on the dumb ass

User avatar
Mikgof
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:26 am
Karma: 1185

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by Mikgof » Mon Jul 02, 2018 6:37 pm

I voted no. No bans unless someone posts something really beyond the pale. And this was nowhere near that.

Also if someone wants someone banned they should at least have the balls to make such a call publicly. Talk about snowflakes.
Surrealism is the new normal

User avatar
jeanV
Posts: 3790
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:25 pm
Karma: 2502

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by jeanV » Tue Jul 03, 2018 3:41 am

Mikgof wrote:
Mon Jul 02, 2018 6:37 pm
I voted no. No bans unless someone posts something really beyond the pale. And this was nowhere near that.
Generally speaking, I agree with that attitude. Hardly no ban ever.

But this case is special. Dumbfuckery? Really?

I mean, it's like, real bad, man. Someone's got to take a stance.

Benedict Arnold Trump is a conceited idiot: Lock him up!!

User avatar
Soft Arrogance
Posts: 605
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:45 am
Karma: 514

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by Soft Arrogance » Tue Jul 03, 2018 3:43 am

What about Jeanv VS Malbarre?
The mind is like an iceberg, it floats with one-seventh of its bulk above water.

Poup
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 12:43 pm
Karma: 42

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by Poup » Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:14 pm

Mikgof wrote:
Mon Jul 02, 2018 6:37 pm
I voted no. No bans unless someone posts something really beyond the pale. And this was nowhere near that.

Also if someone wants someone banned they should at least have the balls to make such a call publicly. Talk about snowflakes.
Ban prissy brits

Start with prince charles twin, milkoff.

User avatar
Mikgof
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:26 am
Karma: 1185

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by Mikgof » Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:46 pm

Poup wrote:
Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:14 pm
Mikgof wrote:
Mon Jul 02, 2018 6:37 pm
I voted no. No bans unless someone posts something really beyond the pale. And this was nowhere near that.

Also if someone wants someone banned they should at least have the balls to make such a call publicly. Talk about snowflakes.
Ban prissy brits

Start with Prince Charles twin, milkoff.
Go ahead then.
Surrealism is the new normal

User avatar
jeanV
Posts: 3790
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:25 pm
Karma: 2502

Re: Anonymous vs. PistolPierre: I need a jury

Post by jeanV » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:42 pm

Poup wrote:
Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:14 pm
Ban prissy brits
No way people will get banned for alleged prissiness.

Not after PP walked away from accusations of dumbfuckery.

I mean, we all agree prissiness is a much less serious offense than dumbfuckery, surely?

:? :shock:
Benedict Arnold Trump is a conceited idiot: Lock him up!!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest